Will ESMA Renew Its Forex/CFD Rules After November 1?

Will ESMA Renew Its Forex/CFD Rules After November 1?
Will ESMA Renew Its Forex/CFD Rules After November 1?, As most traders already know by now, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has enacted rather strict rules that among other things seriously limit how retail traders can trade Forex. The ESMA is a European Union regulatory authority and the rules affect not only the brokers based in Europe, but also all brokers who wish to deal with the EU residents.
The most important changes for currency traders are the following:
  • 1:30 maximum leverage on major pairs (even lower for less liquid assets)
  • 50% margin stop-out rule on per account basis
  • Mandatory negative balance protection
  • Ban on bonuses
  • Standardized risk warning with percentage of unprofitable traders at the broker (for the past 12 months)
The only truly problematic one for traders is the leverage cap. According to brokers, many traders have actively employed full leverage in excess of 1:100. At the same time, it is probably one of the leading causes of many traders’ demise. Other changes are quite beneficial to traders — especially the information about percentage of losing traders at every broker. These numbers more than anything else tells about the actual trading conditions and order execution provided by the broker.
The rules began to apply on August 1. The ESMA itself is calling them ‘temporary intervention measures’ because they are currently set to expire 3 months from August 1, i.e., on November 1. However, there is little indication that they will not be renewed. Especially, considering the fact that the ESMA has extended the initial 3-month ban on binary options for another 3-month period (through January 2, 2019).
We have studied all the 243 brokers currently listed on our website and have found the percentage of losing traders for 97 of them. Even though all brokers in European Union have to report their losing traders percentage in a standard way, we have found that some of them show a weird range instead (for example, IQ OptionBinary.com) or fail to report completely (e.g., Traders Trust). Based on the findings, we have built the following distribution of losing traders percentage:
Distribution of ESMA-regulated CFD brokers by percentage of losing traders (n = 97)
Obviously, the data should be taken with a grain of salt. First, only broker divisions regulated in Europe are counted here. For example, Exness has a nice low percentage of 47%, but it is calculated only based on the clients of Exness (Cy) Ltd registered in Cyprus and excludes the clients of Exness Limited registered in St. Vincent & the Grenadines. Second, the data is calculated every three months based on the previous 12 months of activity. Third, the numbers may not be telling much for brokers with too few clients to report on as some of the get lucky or unlucky through the period. You can look at the full list of brokers with respective percentage of losing traders if you want to see the raw data.
I, personally, believe that the EU bureaucrats have put too much effort into enabling these trading restrictions to let go off them that easily. Brokers have also been made to spend lots of resources to enact the rules. There is also no significant public backlash against them. The situation is currently looks favorable for making the CFD rules permanent rather than abandon them.
Will ESMA renew its Forex/CFD retail trading rules before they expire?
If you have some opinion on the ESMA rules regarding retail Forex/CFD trading, feel free to share them via the commentary form below.